Jump to content

Deeper

Members
  • Content count

    8,675
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Deeper

  1. Deeper

    Cure for Cancer?

    No it means that I haven't actually read all the research there is out there. Did you watch the entire documentary or even half of it? Did you even read any of the research or evidence given on the website I posted? The problem with your remark that "they've tried" is that you must not have actually seen how they "tried" to replicate it. Burzynski owns patents on his formula so that it can't be taken and stolen so users must get permission and use his formula properly for it to work (proper dosages per patient etc). Secondly, Dr. B did license the use of his formula for additional trials (on nine patients) who intern significantly watered down (and they show you their science on this) the solution which caused fluid retention ultimately rendering the affects and proper use of his formula useless on the 9 patients that had been the subjects of the treatment used outside Dr. B's oversight (as they, I want to say it was Elan Pharmaceutical, changed the procedures or protocols, rather, and consistency of the formula without permission). They concluded "oh it doesn't work" but the reason it didn't was because of their blatant misuse and dilution of his formula. I don't want to rewrite what is already in this documentary and in their research on the website I posted. They give you all the facts you need and it's a waste of my time to try and rewrite the info contained in the 2 hour documentary. You can't just reason away all of the evidence pointing to the FDA wanting to steel the genius from this man. I mean, he was taken to the Supreme Court 6 times along with a Dr. he employed infringing on his patents. It appears they wanted to steel it from him because they couldn't get it "legally" through due process. In either case, this man is on to something huge. The FDA wouldn't have spent 60 million in tax payer dollars trying to can this guy for nothing.
  2. Deeper

    Cure for Cancer?

    I can't defend Berzynsky against your accusations only because I haven't done enough research myself, however, did you actually watch the whole documentary? Did you even watch half of the 2-hour long film? I'm just curious, because in it they explain how he garnered all sorts of bad press and publicity but it was at the hand of the FDA and the NCI. You can also get every single piece of evidence off their website: http://www.burzynskimovie.com/ There's problems with your "digging around" because you're reading the material of the people who tried to shut him down. If anyone's biased it's the "research" you're reading. Secondly you can't possibly have watched even half of this documentary. This is a problem because in it is fact after hard fact with multiple sources of evidence to show how this man's work wasn't actually sought to be shelved but stolen. Burzynski had multiple patents on his formula and, towards the end of the over 2-decade battle the United States of America infringed on his patent 11 times. Prior to this the FDA tried to jail him 6 times and found absolutely no grounds to do so. Now I'm certain you didn't watch even the first half of the documentary. Their are multiple cases of FDA-approved clinical trials of Dr. B's formula "curing" the worst types of cancers. There are multiple on-screen interviews with the survivors with their medical records and their clinical trial medical sheets. And in order to be considered cured of anything, you have to be free from it for 5 years. Many if not most of those he treated have been cured for well over a decade with no signs of returning cancer. I honestly don't understand the issues here. A man figures out a non-harmful way to treat the worst types of cancer that are said to be incurable and he cures them but there's still pessimism and you didn't even take time to watch the whole documentary that gave you all the evidence you needed to believe this to be the best thing to hit the "cure for cancer" society?
  3. Link (no this is not a link to CNN) Hm, interesting read. Officially Recognized Attendees
  4. Deeper

    Super Sunsplosion

    The Sun's diameter is 870,000 miles which pretty much means this is the coolest video ever. The remaining gases get sucked back into the sun some nearly tens of thousands of miles away from the point at which the solar flare occurred. That's ridonculous.
  5. Well would you look at that. Not only were those of us who knew we weren't over in Libya for the people called crazy but the first oil deal from the rebels happens to be with the good 'ol USofA and all under the guise of creating a revenue stream for the Libyan people. I mean it doesn't get any better than that! Why? Because Americans actually believe we're trying to help them.
  6. F-16 Fighter Crashes In Rural Wisconsin One man said "in the area they're telling us there's chemical and nuclear warheads on the jet..." That would be scary if that were actually true.
  7. Deeper

    Libyan rebel group sells first oil to U.S.

    This was never in question but what was in question is the reasons for being over in Libya. You say humanitarian and I say oil (among a few others). Please understand that although you and anyone else who may disagree with a sovereign nation doing what they please with their resources such as nationalizing their oil, although upsetting to one's perceived idea of how to handle another's possessions, does not give anyone grounds to try and change that. It would also be logical for the new, nearly instantaneous formation of the Libyan rebel-owned oil company to make an oil deal with the U.S. as a gift due to our efforts in helping them deteriorate the Libyan government because of their oppression, however there were many parties involved in the NATO-led war efforts, not just us. This doesn't seem to be the case, however. It would also make sense economically, as you pointed out, however it is my belief that we were never over there to help them destroy a sovereign nation and its leaders, good or evil, but rather to get their oil to begin with thus my reaction. I never said or suggested you were opposed to them selling oil. The article states that "Libyan's said" that they entered into an oil contract with Qatar which doesn't make it exactly accurate. It would be interesting to figure out who, exactly, obtained a contract first.
  8. I do believe there is greater reason to not trust the Bilderberg meetings and there are good reasons not to. You've clearly made up your mind on the subject, mainly, as it seems, from the research done by mainstream news sources. The problem with those I should add is that much of the information they put out is distorted. If they are there to talk, even in private, to discuss the betterment of the world and its peoples then why is it that they refuse to release their agenda (talking points), a list of attendees, they welcome the company of heads of some of the world's largest most influential corporations, they set up perimeters blocking independent news agencies and journalists from seeing inside the grounds where the meeting is being held, and the list goes on. The problem I have, Yves, isn't even so much that a group of world and economic leaders are convening to coordinate policy or "talk shop" but it is rather the secrecy of the group and associate talking points that is of concern given what is claimed about their gathering. To gather to help nations is a praise-worthy event but the meetings have always been shrouded in darkness and even so-called "moles" have released information regarding the discussions from inside the groups private meeting. This of course cannot be confirmed.
  9. The percentage of any mainstream media outlet reporting on Bilderberg and getting it right isn't very high.
  10. Deeper

    Libyan rebel group sells first oil to U.S.

    Well, as I posted a while back, when Gadaffi Nationalized his oil, the US got angry.
  11. Deeper

    Super Sunsplosion

    Vast Solar Eruption Shocks NASA and Raises Doubts on Sun Theory
  12. China Wants To Construct A 50 Square Mile Self-Sustaining City South Of Boise, Idaho
  13. Deeper

    War on Iraq based on lies

    That or they actually wanted to dictate that nation for oil.
  14. Deeper

    War on Iraq based on lies

    The fact that Valerie Plaim was outed from the CIA by Bush's right hand men because she said there wasn't Yellowcake (WMD's) says it all.
  15. You can't make this stuff up. Ok so can all of the anti-truth, pro-big-government, Bush/Obama-believing Americans please (Please please please) realize how ridiculous this is? I know you trust the government has your best interest, but at what point do you overlook this blatant admission to dispersing this vaccine as a respiratory virus so it gets into the systems of those we're fighting in the Middle East so they can deaden their extreme religious beliefs. "How do you suggest this be dispersed...?" "We've done so far, respiratory viruses such as flu or rhino viruses." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zr-gkMxCrF8
  16. Obviously I can't say for certain that this video is not fake, but if it isn't then this should be getting more attention and in time it will all pan out (I'd hope).
  17. You're assumption isn't backed by any evidence. Organic farmers actually enjoy and find satisfaction in knowing that they are providing a better product than that of the multibillion dollar-a-year food and agriculture corporations. This is going to or may be an unending debate between you and I so my responses from here on out are going to be limited. All the evidence you need is on the internet and easily accessible. I'm tired of debating the health risks that GMO's bring to the table when all society knows is that "it's good for you." You're never taught about what actually goes on behind the scenes.
  18. Federal Judge Prohibits Prayer at Texas Graduation Ceremony Who does this judge think he is? This country is getting more ridiculous by the second. You cannot legally ban words in this country. It's smiffin ridiculous to me that this can actually go on and not get bizarre looks from the right and left.
  19. My mom had to get major surgery because of an increase in estrogen in her body which caused tumors and cysts. Her doctors said was due in part to the hormones in dairy and even research suggests this. My mom's health issues were the catalyst to why we eat mainly organic.
  20. Mitigating the use of what you call "progressive" technology has never been the underlying goal of the organic industry. Tightening the grip on GMO crops has proven to be useless over time. As time passes new legislation is brought forward and signed against the will of the people. Big corporations like Monsanto lobby for GMO crops, not to help the world as you think but to make money at the expense of the world's health. Europe hates Monsanto, for example, and banned them from growing there. Monsanto, however, was found growing in Ireland, illegally. Not even Europe's ban stopped them, what makes you think tighter parameters will work to stop contamination? There is nothing irrational about not wanting contamination of organic produce and livestock. Do you not even realize how fooled the Americans are? We claim to have been here for millions of years - that's millions of years of organic produce and livestock - but only in the last 100 years have they duped us into thinking our food supply is going to run out and that GMO is the way to go. They've realized how lazy and unintelligent humans can be and play us like Al Gore plays Europe. No, Yves, this is not progress for the public but rather progress for their bank accounts.
×