~Jessica~ Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Canada, where the men are men and the cows are scared[/b] i literally laughed out loud Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
telegram Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 No, actually, it sounds like two people who had to wade through a sea of bureaucracy because the state rejected a document for referring to them as "bride" and "groom." I don't think you'd want your marriage certificate rejected over something clerical like that, were you ever to marry.[/b] It wasn't their place to try and rewrite a legal document so of course it was going to be rejected. Many people get married everyday in California and Massachusetts with no problem being referred to as "Party A" and "Party B" in a legal document. Is it a coincidence that the people who are most upset by this just so happen to be not so big fans of gay marriage? And perhaps it's more about that then what is written on a piece of paper, a legal document. Not a religious one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
curlyQ Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Yes, I remember hearing about this earlier. How disgusting. "You may kiss Partner B." Gross. America is definitely going down the drain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
telegram Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Yes, I remember hearing about this earlier. How disgusting. "You may kiss Partner B." Gross. America is definitely going down the drain.[/b] "Partner A" and "Partner B" play no part in the wedding ceremony or really anything outside of the legal document. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paper Towels Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 This is an abomination. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reincarnate Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 (Or goats, Brandon and Andrew )[/b] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deeper Posted September 30, 2008 Author Share Posted September 30, 2008 See, the real problem is that all the homosexual couples in California couldn't decide who was going to be "the man" and the state decided that changing the form was cheaper than paying law enforcement to handle all of the inevitable domestic disputes.[/b] ha I lol'd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.